← Folk Protocol

Devil's Claw

Harpagophytum procumbens

Also known as: grapple plant, wood spider, Teufelskralle

Kalahari-native root with Cochrane-endorsed evidence for low back pain and osteoarthritis. Narrow indication, solid data, and a favorable safety profile compared to the NSAIDs it was tested against. The evidence base is aging but consistent.

Used for: back painjoint painosteoarthritisinflammationdigestive support

Traditional Use

Traditions: African traditional medicine (San/Khoikhoi), European phytomedicine

Historical Attributions

Root decoctions for joint pain, rheumatic conditions, fever, and digestive complaints. Topical application during labor — likely the source of the oxytocic contraindication now in regulatory guidance. The secondary root tubers were harvested, sliced, sun-dried, and boiled.

— San and Khoikhoi peoples, Kalahari (first documented 1901)

Commission E approved for dyspepsia, appetite stimulation, and degenerative musculoskeletal disorders. EMA classifies as a traditional herbal medicinal product (30+ years of use, plausible efficacy, insufficient RCT evidence for 'well-established use' status). Not part of traditional European herbalism — adopted following colonial-era botanical contact.

— German Commission E / EMA HMPC (20th–21st century European phytomedicine)

Evidence

Devil's claw has one of the more clearly defined evidence profiles in herbal medicine: musculoskeletal pain, particularly low back pain and osteoarthritis. Cochrane review endorses aqueous extract at 50–100 mg harpagoside/day for LBP. Active comparator trials show non-inferior efficacy to rofecoxib and meloxicam with substantially fewer adverse events. The limitation: 86% of trials are more than 20 years old, and no large modern placebo-controlled trials have been conducted.

Key Studies

  • Chrubasik 1996 — First LBP RCT (1996)

    105 completed; 17.6% pain-free in treatment group vs. 1.9% in placebo at 4 weeks (50 mg harpagoside/day). Proof-of-concept: modest absolute rate but striking placebo difference.

  • Chrubasik 1999 — Dose-Comparison RCT (WS 1531) (1999)

    183 patients, chronic LBP. Dose-dependent effect: 10 pain-free at 100 mg harpagoside/day vs. 3 placebo (p=0.027). Established harpagoside dose as the primary efficacy determinant.

  • Chrubasik 2003 — Devil's Claw vs. Rofecoxib Pilot (2003)

    88 patients, acutely exacerbated LBP, 6 weeks. Non-inferior pain reduction to rofecoxib 12.5 mg/day; AE drop-outs 1 (devil's claw) vs. 6 (rofecoxib).

  • Chrubasik 2005 — 54-Week Long-Term Follow-Up (2005)

    73 patients, 21,761 patient-days. 28% pain-free; 39% mild pain; 3 minor drug reactions total. Only long-term safety dataset for this herb.

  • Chantre / Leblan 2000 — Devil's Claw vs. Diacerhein (OA) (2000)

    122 patients with hip/knee OA, 4 months. Equivalent pain and function outcomes; diarrhea 8.1% (devil's claw) vs. 26.7% (diacerhein); fewer total adverse events.

  • Wegener 2003 — WOMAC Outcomes (Arthrosis) (2003)

    75 patients, 12 weeks uncontrolled. WOMAC overall −22.9%; pain −23.8%; physical function −23.1%. No placebo arm.

  • Farpour 2021 — Teltonal vs. Meloxicam (Knee OA) (2021)

    60 adults with mild knee OA. Comparable VAS, WOMAC, and Oxford Knee Scale at 8-week follow-up. Most recent RCT.

  • Gagnier 2007 — Cochrane Review (LBP) (2007)

    Strong evidence for short-term pain improvement at 50–100 mg harpagoside/day. One trial demonstrated equivalence to 12.5 mg rofecoxib/day.

Preparations

extract — WS 1531: 600 mg/day (50 mg harpagoside) to 1,200 mg/day (100 mg harpagoside) | Doloteffin: ~2 tablets/day (60 mg harpagoside) | Teltonal: 2 × 480 mg/day (~50 mg harpagoside)

Aqueous extracts have the strongest clinical evidence base. The dosing unit that matters is harpagoside per day, not extract weight. Products should declare mg harpagoside per serving. Ethanolic extracts providing <30 mg harpagoside/day have insufficient evidence.

decoction — 4–6g dried secondary root tubers per day

Taste: Profoundly bitter, strongly reminiscent of quinine or concentrated tonic water. This is the active bitter principle — it's doing what it's supposed to do.

Boil 4–6g root slices in 500 mL water for 15–30 minutes. At ≥1.2% harpagoside (pharmacopoeial standard), 4.5g provides ~54–67 mg harpagoside — consistent with clinical dosing. Cold maceration overnight (1.5–2.5g in 250 mL cold water, 8 hours) preserves harpagoside better than prolonged boiling. Very bitter — expected and traditional.

capsule — 2,400–2,610 mg/day (dried root powder)

At pharmacopoeial minimum of 1.2% harpagoside, a 500 mg capsule = 6 mg harpagoside, requiring ~8 capsules/day for the 50 mg threshold. More practical with standardized extract capsules declaring harpagoside per capsule. Cryoground powder (Harpadol formulation) preserves iridoid content better than heat-processed forms.

tincture — 15–30 mL/day of 1:5 tincture (25–30% ethanol)

Ethanolic extraction is less efficient than aqueous for harpagoside. Most commercial tinctures won't reach 50 mg/day without a very high volume. Use only if you can verify harpagoside content per mL. Generally the weakest option for clinical-level dosing.

What The Evidence Says

Devil’s claw has a narrow but genuinely solid evidence profile: musculoskeletal pain, specifically low back pain and osteoarthritis. This isn’t an herb trying to do everything. The clinical work concentrates tightly on these two indications, and the Cochrane collaboration has weighed in.

Strong evidence (Cochrane-endorsed):

Active comparator trials — this is where it gets interesting:

Moderate evidence:

What the evidence doesn’t cover: Headache, nerve pain, fibromyalgia, or any pain other than musculoskeletal. The digestive indications have traditional but not clinical evidence. This herb has a lane.

Important caveat: 86% of clinical trials are more than 20 years old [12]. No large modern placebo-controlled trials exist. The evidence is consistent and Cochrane-endorsed, but it is aging.

Traditional Use

Devil’s claw is exclusively African — it grows in the Kalahari Desert (Namibia, Botswana, South Africa) and has no history in Ayurveda, TCM, or any non-African system. The San and Khoikhoi peoples used root decoctions for joint pain, rheumatic conditions, fever, digestive complaints, and appetite. The first explicit documented medicinal account was recorded in 1901 — recent by botanical standards, though oral traditional use is certainly older.

European phytomedicine adopted it in the 1960s–70s. German Commission E approved it for dyspepsia, appetite stimulation, and degenerative musculoskeletal disorders. The EMA classifies it as a traditional herbal medicinal product — meaning plausible efficacy based on 30+ years of use, but insufficient RCT evidence to reach “well-established use” status.

The bitter taste has therapeutic meaning: traditional bitter tonics stimulate gastric acid and bile secretion. This is the mechanism behind the digestive and appetite indications — and it’s also why this herb is contraindicated in peptic ulcer disease. The bitterness is the active principle.

How To Try It

Choose Your Preparation

The critical variable is total harpagoside dose per day, not brand or form. Clinical evidence is built on 50–100 mg harpagoside/day from aqueous extracts. Every product should declare harpagoside per serving. If it doesn’t, you can’t dose it reliably.

Standardized extracts (most studied, most reliable):

ProductTypeDaily DoseHarpagoside/Day
WS 1531Aqueous extract600–1,200 mg50–100 mg
DoloteffinStandardized~2 tablets60 mg
TeltonalStandardized2 × 480 mg~50 mg

Decoction (traditional, viable):

Capsules (powdered root):

Tinctures (usually inadequate):

Dosing by Indication

Take with food. Always.

Timeline Expectations

What To Track

Baseline (1 week before starting):

During trial:

RED FLAGS — stop and reassess:

Who This Is/Isn’t For

Strong Candidates:

What they experience: pain reduction that builds over 4–8 weeks for LBP, reduced analgesic use, improved walking tolerance. Some OA patients report notable reduction in stiffness.

Poor Fit / Contraindicated:

On the safety comparison: The 3% minor AE rate in systematic review data [9] looks different when you see what devil’s claw was compared to — diacerhein caused diarrhea in 26.7% of patients, rofecoxib caused 6 AE-related drop-outs vs. 1. Within its niche, the tolerability profile is a genuine advantage.

The Bitter Root

Devil’s claw is genuinely, impressively bitter. Not “tastes a bit herbal” — closer to concentrated quinine or the most bitter tonic water you’ve had, but earthier. This isn’t incidental.

The bitter iridoid compounds are the active compounds. The bitterness is information: it’s stimulating gastric acid and bile secretion, exactly as traditional digestive bitters have done for centuries. That same mechanism is why this herb is contraindicated with peptic ulcers — it exacerbates the very thing it would stimulate.

If you’re making decoctions, expect to work with this taste. Cold maceration produces a less intensely bitter preparation than boiling. Some people find it tolerable, even acquiring a preference for it the way people do with strong coffee or bitter aperitifs. Most prefer capsules. Capsules avoid the taste entirely without compromising efficacy — the clinical trials mostly used standardized capsules.

Quality Matters (Non-Negotiable)

The consumer information gap: A 2025 analysis of 88 devil’s claw products found that 100% of dietary supplements reported no adverse drug reaction information. Pharmaceutical-grade products reported it correctly. The supplement market does not [10].

What to look for:

What to avoid:

Sustainability: Devil’s claw is wild-harvested from the Kalahari. Commercial demand has raised overharvesting concerns in Namibia and Botswana. Certification programs for sustainably sourced material exist — worth seeking when available.

The Bottom Line

Devil’s claw works for musculoskeletal pain. Low back pain and osteoarthritis, specifically. The comparison to NSAIDs and osteoarthritis drugs is the headline: non-inferior efficacy, substantially fewer adverse events. That’s a real and meaningful result for people who need long-term joint support and can’t tolerate NSAID side effects.

When it works: Pain reduction that builds over 4–8 weeks for LBP, notable improvement in OA over 4 months. Reduced need for rescue analgesics. About 50–70% of patients in observational data report benefit [4].

When it won’t work: Anything other than musculoskeletal pain. Also won’t work if harpagoside dose is too low — most tinctures and under-dosed capsules won’t reach the 50 mg/day threshold that clinical evidence is built on. Getting the dose right matters more than preparation form.

The contraindications are firm: Gastric ulcers and pregnancy are absolute. Warfarin users need INR monitoring. The hypertension case report warrants blood pressure awareness if you’re at cardiovascular risk.

The aging evidence base is a real limitation. No large modern RCTs exist. But what does exist is consistent, replicated across multiple comparator drugs, and Cochrane-reviewed. For the right indication — chronic back pain, OA, NSAID intolerance — this is a well-supported, well-characterized choice.

Choose a product that declares harpagoside per serving. Use aqueous extracts or standardized preparations. Give LBP 4 weeks and OA 4 months. Track your NSAID use — that’s often where you’ll see the first signal.

Trying It

Duration: 4 weeks for acute LBP. 4 months minimum for osteoarthritis. Up to 54 weeks appears safe for chronic conditions.

What to notice:

  • Pain level (1–10) — weekly
  • Functional range: walking distance, bending, carrying capacity
  • NSAID/analgesic use per week (should decline if working)
  • Sleep quality if pain disrupts sleep
  • GI symptoms, especially diarrhea (early warning sign)
  • Blood pressure if using higher doses

Take with food — always. The bitter stimulation of gastric acid that makes this useful for digestion also means an empty stomach will amplify any GI irritation. For LBP, you should notice meaningful change within 2–4 weeks if you're going to respond; if nothing at 4 weeks, you likely won't respond to this preparation. For OA, do not evaluate before 4 months — the mechanism here is slower. Harpagoside dose is the critical variable: if you're not reaching 50 mg/day, you're not in the evidence range.

Combinations

Safety

Generally considered: caution

Contraindications:

  • Peptic ulcers (gastric or duodenal) — ABSOLUTE: devil's claw acts as a bitter digestive stimulant, increasing gastric acid secretion; directly exacerbates ulcer disease
  • Pregnancy — ABSOLUTE: oxytocic properties documented in vitro; theoretical risk of stimulating uterine contractions; traditional use in labor supports this concern
  • Known hypersensitivity to Harpagophytum preparations (rash, hives, facial swelling)
  • Breastfeeding — avoid (no safety data; EMA does not recommend)
  • Gallstones — caution: bile-stimulating effect may trigger biliary colic
  • Warfarin/anticoagulants — monitor INR: case reports suggest possible potentiation via CYP450 modulation
  • Antidiabetic medications — monitor blood glucose: preclinical hypoglycemic data and traditional diabetes use
  • Children under 18 — no RCT data; EMA restricted to adults

Pregnancy/Nursing: Contraindicated in pregnancy due to documented oxytocic (uterus-stimulating) properties in vitro and traditional use during labor. Not recommended in breastfeeding — no human safety data.

Generally well-tolerated. Systematic review of 28 trials (n reported AEs) found minor adverse events in approximately 3% of patients, mainly GI, with no trial showing higher AE incidence than placebo [9]. Comparison: diacerhein caused diarrhea in 26.7% vs. 8.1% with devil's claw; rofecoxib caused 6 AE-related drop-outs vs. 1 with devil's claw. One case report of grade 2 hypertension (175/100 mmHg) in a 62-year-old woman taking 500 mg/day for 2 weeks — resolved within 2 weeks of stopping; proposed mechanism is COX-2 inhibition suppressing vasodilator prostaglandins (analogous to NSAID-class hypertensive effect). Monitor blood pressure in patients at cardiovascular risk. Long-term safety: 21,761 patient-days of data shows good tolerability with only 3 minor drug reactions. No formal 12-month placebo-controlled safety study has been completed.

Sources